Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Acer - Predator X32 X3 vs Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Predator X32 X3ACERRENDER
Probe A
Acer
Predator X32 X3
73.2/ 100B
Performance84· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
UltraSharp U3825QWDELLRENDER
Probe B
Dell
UltraSharp U3825QW
71.2/ 100B
Performance70· 45%
Panel72· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the Predator X32 X3 and UltraSharp U3825QW, the Predator X32 X3 comes out ahead in peak brightness / refresh rate, while the UltraSharp U3825QW wins on usb-c power delivery / screen size. Overall, the Predator X32 X3 scores 73.2 and the UltraSharp U3825QW scores 71.2 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 71.2). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Predator X32 X3 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.

Pick the UltraSharp U3825QW if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, screen size.

Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Acer - Predator X32 X3 wins

  • Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
  • Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
  • Has G-Sync.
  • Has FreeSync.
  • Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).

Why Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW wins

  • USB-C Power Delivery — 55.56% more. 140 W vs 90 W.
  • Screen size — 17.19% more. 37.5 " vs 32 ".
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecAcer - Predator X32 X3Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW
Screen size32 "37.5 "lead
Panel typeOLEDleadIPS
Resolution4K4K
Aspect ratio16:921:9
Curvedfalsetruelead

Performance

SpecAcer - Predator X32 X3Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW
Refresh rate240 Hzlead120 Hz
Response time (GtG)0.03 mslead5 ms
Peak brightness1000 nitslead450 nits
DCI-P3 coverage99 %99 %
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctrueleadfalse
FreeSynctrueleadfalse

Connectivity

SpecAcer - Predator X32 X3Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW
HDMI ports22
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery90 W140 Wlead
KVMtruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, Predator X32 X3 or UltraSharp U3825QW?+

Predator X32 X3 refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.

Which has faster response time, Predator X32 X3 or UltraSharp U3825QW?+

Predator X32 X3 responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.

Does Predator X32 X3 or UltraSharp U3825QW have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on Predator X32 X3, 140W on UltraSharp U3825QW.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.