Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Dell - Alienware AW3225QF vs Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Alienware AW3225QFDELLRENDER
Probe A
Dell
Alienware AW3225QF
72.8/ 100B
Performance84· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Smart Monitor M8 (2024)SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe B
Samsung
Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
65.5/ 100C
Performance70· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the Alienware AW3225QF and Smart Monitor M8 (2024), the Alienware AW3225QF comes out ahead in refresh rate / peak brightness, while the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins on screen size / usb-c power delivery. Overall, the Alienware AW3225QF scores 72.8 and the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) scores 65.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Alienware AW3225QF edges ahead on the Mars Score (72.8 vs 65.5), but the 7.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Alienware AW3225QF if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.

Pick the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are screen size, usb-c power delivery.

Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the Alienware AW3225QF is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Dell - Alienware AW3225QF wins

  • Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 240 Hz vs 60 Hz.
  • Peak brightness — 150.00% more. 1000 nits vs 400 nits.
  • Response time (GtG) — 99.25% less. 0.03 ms vs 4 ms.
  • Has G-Sync.
  • Has FreeSync.
  • Panel type: QD-OLED (vs VA).

Why Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins

  • Screen size — 1.27% more. 32 " vs 31.6 ".
  • USB-C Power Delivery: 65 W vs 0 W.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecDell - Alienware AW3225QFSamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
Screen size31.6 "32 "lead
Panel typeQD-OLEDleadVA
Resolution4K4K
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curvedtrueleadfalse

Performance

SpecDell - Alienware AW3225QFSamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
Refresh rate240 Hzlead60 Hz
Response time (GtG)0.03 mslead4 ms
Peak brightness1000 nitslead400 nits
DCI-P3 coverage99 %99 %
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctrueleadfalse
FreeSynctrueleadfalse

Connectivity

SpecDell - Alienware AW3225QFSamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
HDMI ports2lead1
DisplayPort ports1lead0
USB-C inputfalsetruelead
USB-C Power Delivery0 W65 Wlead
KVMfalsefalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, Alienware AW3225QF or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+

Alienware AW3225QF refreshes at 240Hz vs 60Hz.

Which has faster response time, Alienware AW3225QF or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+

Alienware AW3225QF responds in 0.03ms vs 4ms.

Does Alienware AW3225QF or Smart Monitor M8 (2024) have USB-C with power delivery?+

Smart Monitor M8 (2024) offers USB-C with 65W power delivery.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.