Between the ROG Swift PG39WCDM and ProArt PA32UCXR, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM comes out ahead in refresh rate / response time (gtg), while the ProArt PA32UCXR wins on peak brightness / usb-c power delivery. Overall, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM scores 79.8 and the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 65.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 14.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the ROG Swift PG39WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, response time (gtg), screen size, among others.
Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, usb-c power delivery.
Both ship with comparable freesync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 21.88% more. 39 " vs 32 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 23.08% more. 1600 nits vs 1300 nits.
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 6.67% more. 96 W vs 90 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 39 "lead | 32 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 1440p | 4Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | truelead | false |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1300 nits | 1600 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 3lead |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 W | 96 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
ROG Swift PG39WCDM refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
ROG Swift PG39WCDM responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does ROG Swift PG39WCDM or ProArt PA32UCXR have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on ROG Swift PG39WCDM, 96W on ProArt PA32UCXR.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.