ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
Between the ROG Swift PG39WCDM and Smart Monitor M8 (2024), the ROG Swift PG39WCDM comes out ahead in refresh rate / peak brightness, while the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins on several specs. Overall, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM scores 79.8 and the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) scores 65.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 14.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the ROG Swift PG39WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.
The Smart Monitor M8 (2024) similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 240 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 225.00% more. 1300 nits vs 400 nits.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.25% less. 0.03 ms vs 4 ms.
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Screen size — 21.88% more. 39 " vs 32 ".
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs VA).
Why Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 39 "lead | 32 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | VA |
| Resolutionⓘ | 1440p | 4Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | truelead | false |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 60 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 4 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1300 nitslead | 400 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1lead | 0 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 Wlead | 65 W |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+
ROG Swift PG39WCDM refreshes at 240Hz vs 60Hz.
Which has faster response time, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+
ROG Swift PG39WCDM responds in 0.03ms vs 4ms.
Does ROG Swift PG39WCDM or Smart Monitor M8 (2024) have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on ROG Swift PG39WCDM, 65W on Smart Monitor M8 (2024).
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.