Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW vs Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P
Between the UltraSharp U3825QW and AORUS FO32U2P, the UltraSharp U3825QW comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery / screen size, while the AORUS FO32U2P wins on peak brightness / refresh rate. Overall, the UltraSharp U3825QW scores 71.2 and the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (71.2 vs 73.2). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the UltraSharp U3825QW if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, screen size.
Pick the AORUS FO32U2P if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.
Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 115.38% more. 140 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Screen size — 17.19% more. 37.5 " vs 32 ".
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 37.5 "lead | 32 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | truelead | false |
Performance
| Spec | Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 240 Hzlead |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 5 ms | 0.03 mslead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 450 nits | 1000 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | truelead |
| FreeSyncⓘ | false | truelead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 2lead |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 140 Wlead | 65 W |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, UltraSharp U3825QW or AORUS FO32U2P?+
AORUS FO32U2P refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, UltraSharp U3825QW or AORUS FO32U2P?+
AORUS FO32U2P responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does UltraSharp U3825QW or AORUS FO32U2P have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 140W on UltraSharp U3825QW, 65W on AORUS FO32U2P.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.