Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P vs Lenovo - Legion Y32p-30 4K
Between the AORUS FO32U2P and Legion Y32p-30 4K, the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in peak brightness / response time (gtg), while the Legion Y32p-30 4K wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 and the Legion Y32p-30 4K scores 69.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The AORUS FO32U2P edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 69.2), but the 4.0-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the AORUS FO32U2P if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, response time (gtg), refresh rate, among others.
Pick the Legion Y32p-30 4K if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery.
Both ship with comparable screen size, g-sync, freesync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 97.00% less. 0.03 ms vs 1 ms.
- ▲Refresh rate — 66.67% more. 240 Hz vs 144 Hz.
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 3.13% more. 99 % vs 96 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Why Lenovo - Legion Y32p-30 4K wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | Lenovo - Legion Y32p-30 4K |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 " | 32 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | Lenovo - Legion Y32p-30 4K |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 144 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 1 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nitslead | 450 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 96 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | Lenovo - Legion Y32p-30 4K |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 2lead | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 90 Wlead |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or Legion Y32p-30 4K?+
AORUS FO32U2P refreshes at 240Hz vs 144Hz.
Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or Legion Y32p-30 4K?+
AORUS FO32U2P responds in 0.03ms vs 1ms.
Does AORUS FO32U2P or Legion Y32p-30 4K have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on AORUS FO32U2P, 90W on Legion Y32p-30 4K.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.