Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P vs Lenovo - ThinkVision P27u-20
Between the AORUS FO32U2P and ThinkVision P27u-20, the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in refresh rate / peak brightness, while the ThinkVision P27u-20 wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 and the ThinkVision P27u-20 scores 58.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The AORUS FO32U2P is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 14.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the AORUS FO32U2P if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.
Pick the ThinkVision P27u-20 if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery.
Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the AORUS FO32U2P is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 240 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 150.00% more. 1000 nits vs 400 nits.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.50% less. 0.03 ms vs 6 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Why Lenovo - ThinkVision P27u-20 wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 53.85% more. 100 W vs 65 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | Lenovo - ThinkVision P27u-20 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 27 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | Lenovo - ThinkVision P27u-20 |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 60 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 6 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nitslead | 400 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | Lenovo - ThinkVision P27u-20 |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 2lead | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 100 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or ThinkVision P27u-20?+
AORUS FO32U2P refreshes at 240Hz vs 60Hz.
Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or ThinkVision P27u-20?+
AORUS FO32U2P responds in 0.03ms vs 6ms.
Does AORUS FO32U2P or ThinkVision P27u-20 have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on AORUS FO32U2P, 100W on ThinkVision P27u-20.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.