vsMars
Head-to-head

Gigabyte - M27Q X vs LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
M27Q XGIGABYTERENDER
Probe A
Gigabyte
M27Q X
65.7/ 100C
Performance79· 45%
Panel49· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual…LGRENDER
Probe B
LG
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)
72.5/ 100B
Performance83· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the M27Q X and UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode), the M27Q X comes out ahead in several specs, while the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins on usb-c power delivery / peak brightness. Overall, the M27Q X scores 65.7 and the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) scores 72.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) edges ahead on the Mars Score (65.7 vs 72.5), but the 6.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

The M27Q X does not pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec-table groups rather than the headline advantages.

Pick the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, g-sync, freesync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Gigabyte - M27Q X wins

  • No decisive advantages.

Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins

  • ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 333.33% more. 65 W vs 15 W.
  • ▲Peak brightness — 225.00% more. 1300 nits vs 400 nits.
  • ▲Response time (GtG) — 90.00% less. 0.03 ms vs 0.3 ms.
  • ▲Screen size — 16.67% more. 31.5 " vs 27 ".
  • ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 7.07% more. 98.5 % vs 92 %.
  • ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecGigabyte - M27Q XLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)
Screen sizeⓘ27 "31.5 "lead
Panel typeⓘIPSOLEDlead
Resolutionⓘ1440p4Klead
Aspect ratioⓘ16:916:9
Curvedⓘfalsefalse

Performance

SpecGigabyte - M27Q XLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)
Refresh rateⓘ240 Hz240 Hz
Response time (GtG)ⓘ0.3 ms0.03 mslead
Peak brightnessⓘ400 nits1300 nitslead
DCI-P3 coverageⓘ92 %98.5 %lead
HDRⓘtruetrue
G-Syncⓘtruetrue
FreeSyncⓘtruetrue

Connectivity

SpecGigabyte - M27Q XLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)
HDMI ports22
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ15 W65 Wlead
KVMtrueleadfalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, M27Q X or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)?+

UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.

Which has faster response time, M27Q X or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)?+

UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) responds in 0.03ms vs 0.3ms.

Does M27Q X or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 15W on M27Q X, 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode).

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

Screen size→Panel type→Resolution→Aspect ratio→Curved→Refresh rate→Response time (GtG)→Peak brightness→DCI-P3 coverage→HDR→G-Sync→FreeSync→
By manufacturer

More from the same brands

Gigabyte →4
LG →4

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.