Between the ThinkVision P27u-20 and MPG 321URX, the ThinkVision P27u-20 comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery, while the MPG 321URX wins on refresh rate and peak brightness. Overall, the ThinkVision P27u-20 scores 58.3 and the MPG 321URX scores 73.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The MPG 321URX is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 14.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the ThinkVision P27u-20 if you care most about usb-c power delivery. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery.
Pick the MPG 321URX if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.
Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the MPG 321URX is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Lenovo - ThinkVision P27u-20 wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 2.04% more. 100 W vs 98 W.
Why MSI - MPG 321URX wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 240 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 150.00% more. 1000 nits vs 400 nits.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.50% less. 0.03 ms vs 6 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Lenovo - ThinkVision P27u-20 | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 27 " | 32 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Lenovo - ThinkVision P27u-20 | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 60 Hz | 240 Hzlead |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 6 ms | 0.03 mslead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 400 nits | 1000 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | truelead |
| FreeSyncⓘ | false | truelead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Lenovo - ThinkVision P27u-20 | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 1 | 2lead |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 100 Wlead | 98 W |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, ThinkVision P27u-20 or MPG 321URX?+
MPG 321URX refreshes at 240Hz vs 60Hz.
Which has faster response time, ThinkVision P27u-20 or MPG 321URX?+
MPG 321URX responds in 0.03ms vs 6ms.
Does ThinkVision P27u-20 or MPG 321URX have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 100W on ThinkVision P27u-20, 98W on MPG 321URX.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.