Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) vs Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual…LGRENDER
Probe A
LG
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)
72.5/ 100B
Performance83· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Smart Monitor M8 (2024)SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe B
Samsung
Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
65.5/ 100C
Performance70· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) and Smart Monitor M8 (2024), the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) comes out ahead in refresh rate / peak brightness, while the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins on screen size / dci-p3 coverage. Overall, the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) scores 72.5 and the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) scores 65.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) edges ahead on the Mars Score (72.5 vs 65.5), but the 7.0-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.

Pick the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are screen size, dci-p3 coverage.

Both ship with comparable usb-c power delivery, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins

  • Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 240 Hz vs 60 Hz.
  • Peak brightness — 225.00% more. 1300 nits vs 400 nits.
  • Response time (GtG) — 99.25% less. 0.03 ms vs 4 ms.
  • Has G-Sync.
  • Has FreeSync.
  • Panel type: OLED (vs VA).

Why Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins

  • Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
  • DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
Screen size31.5 "32 "lead
Panel typeOLEDleadVA
Resolution4K4K
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curvedfalsefalse

Performance

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
Refresh rate240 Hzlead60 Hz
Response time (GtG)0.03 mslead4 ms
Peak brightness1300 nitslead400 nits
DCI-P3 coverage98.5 %99 %lead
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctrueleadfalse
FreeSynctrueleadfalse

Connectivity

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
HDMI ports2lead1
DisplayPort ports1lead0
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery65 W65 W
KVMfalsefalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+

UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) refreshes at 240Hz vs 60Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+

UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) responds in 0.03ms vs 4ms.

Does UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or Smart Monitor M8 (2024) have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode), 65W on Smart Monitor M8 (2024).

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.