MSI - MPG 321URX vs Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
Between the MPG 321URX and Smart Monitor M8 (2024), the MPG 321URX comes out ahead in refresh rate / peak brightness, while the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins on several specs. Overall, the MPG 321URX scores 73.2 and the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) scores 65.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The MPG 321URX edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 65.5), but the 7.7-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the MPG 321URX if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.
The Smart Monitor M8 (2024) similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, screen size, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the MPG 321URX is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why MSI - MPG 321URX wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 240 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 150.00% more. 1000 nits vs 400 nits.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.25% less. 0.03 ms vs 4 ms.
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 50.77% more. 98 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs VA).
Why Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | MSI - MPG 321URX | Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 " | 32 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | VA |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | MSI - MPG 321URX | Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 60 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 4 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nitslead | 400 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | MSI - MPG 321URX | Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1lead | 0 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 98 Wlead | 65 W |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, MPG 321URX or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+
MPG 321URX refreshes at 240Hz vs 60Hz.
Which has faster response time, MPG 321URX or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+
MPG 321URX responds in 0.03ms vs 4ms.
Does MPG 321URX or Smart Monitor M8 (2024) have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 98W on MPG 321URX, 65W on Smart Monitor M8 (2024).
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.