Between the ProArt PA32UCXR and UltraGear 27GX790A-B, the ProArt PA32UCXR comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery / peak brightness, while the UltraGear 27GX790A-B wins on refresh rate / response time (gtg). Overall, the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 65.4 and the UltraGear 27GX790A-B scores 72.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The UltraGear 27GX790A-B edges ahead on the Mars Score (65.4 vs 72.6), but the 7.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, peak brightness, screen size.
Pick the UltraGear 27GX790A-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are refresh rate, response time (gtg), g-sync, among others.
Both ship with comparable freesync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the UltraGear 27GX790A-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 47.69% more. 96 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Peak brightness — 23.08% more. 1600 nits vs 1300 nits.
- ▲Screen size — 20.75% more. 32 " vs 26.5 ".
Why LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 480 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 98.5 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 26.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4Klead | 1440p |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 480 Hzlead |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 5 ms | 0.03 mslead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1600 nitslead | 1300 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 98 % | 98.5 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | truelead |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 3lead | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 96 Wlead | 65 W |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, ProArt PA32UCXR or UltraGear 27GX790A-B?+
UltraGear 27GX790A-B refreshes at 480Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, ProArt PA32UCXR or UltraGear 27GX790A-B?+
UltraGear 27GX790A-B responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does ProArt PA32UCXR or UltraGear 27GX790A-B have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 96W on ProArt PA32UCXR, 65W on UltraGear 27GX790A-B.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.