Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B |
|---|---|---|
| Response time (GtG) | 0.03 ms | 1 ms |
| Peak brightness | 1000 nits | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 160 Hz |
| Screen size | 32 " | 27 " |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99 % | 98 % |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
Between the Predator X32 X3 and UltraGear 27GP950-B, the Predator X32 X3 comes out ahead in response time (gtg) / peak brightness, while the UltraGear 27GP950-B wins on several specs. Overall, the Predator X32 X3 scores 76.8 and the UltraGear 27GP950-B scores 78.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (76.8 vs 78.2). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Predator X32 X3 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are response time (gtg), peak brightness, refresh rate, among others. The single most decisive one: Response time (GtG) — 97.00% less. 0.03 ms vs 1 ms.
The UltraGear 27GP950-B similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable g-sync, freesync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Acer - Predator X32 X3 or LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B?
LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B leads the current Mars Score by 1.4 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size, refresh rate, panel type against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Acer - Predator X32 X3 if…
Acer - Predator X32 X3 has the measurable edge on response time ms, peak brightness nits, refresh rate hz.
Choose LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B if…
LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Acer - Predator X32 X3 wins
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 97.00% less. 0.03 ms vs 1 ms.
- ▲Peak brightness — 66.67% more. 1000 nits vs 600 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 50.00% more. 240 Hz vs 160 Hz.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Why LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 32 "lead | 27 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 160 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 1 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nitslead | 600 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C inputⓘ | truelead | false |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 W | — |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Predator X32 X3 or UltraGear 27GP950-B?+
Predator X32 X3 refreshes at 240Hz vs 160Hz.
Which has faster response time, Predator X32 X3 or UltraGear 27GP950-B?+
Predator X32 X3 responds in 0.03ms vs 1ms.
Does Predator X32 X3 or UltraGear 27GP950-B have USB-C with power delivery?+
Predator X32 X3 offers USB-C with 90W power delivery.