Dell - Alienware AW3225QF vs Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Dell - Alienware AW3225QF | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31.6 " | 49 " |
| G-Sync | true | false |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 0 W | 65 W |
Between the Alienware AW3225QF and Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), the Alienware AW3225QF comes out ahead in g-sync, while the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins on screen size / usb-c power delivery. Overall, the Alienware AW3225QF scores 78.1 and the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) scores 85.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) edges ahead on the Mars Score (78.1 vs 85.6), but the 7.5-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Alienware AW3225QF if you care most about g-sync. The biggest gaps in its favor are g-sync. The single most decisive one: Has G-Sync.
Pick the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are screen size, usb-c power delivery. The single most decisive one: Screen size — 55.06% more. 49 " vs 31.6 ".
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), peak brightness, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Dell - Alienware AW3225QF or Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?
Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) leads the current Mars Score by 7.5 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Dell - Alienware AW3225QF if…
Dell - Alienware AW3225QF has the measurable edge on has g sync.
Choose Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if…
Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) has the measurable edge on screen size in, has usb c pd w.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Dell - Alienware AW3225QF wins
- ▲Has G-Sync.
Why Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins
- ▲Screen size — 55.06% more. 49 " vs 31.6 ".
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery: 65 W vs 0 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Dell - Alienware AW3225QF | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 31.6 " | 49 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLED | QD-OLED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 5Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 32:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | true | true |
Performance
| Spec | Dell - Alienware AW3225QF | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1000 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Dell - Alienware AW3225QF | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C inputⓘ | false | truelead |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 0 W | 65 Wlead |
| KVM | false | truelead |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Alienware AW3225QF or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, Alienware AW3225QF or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does Alienware AW3225QF or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) have USB-C with power delivery?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) offers USB-C with 65W power delivery.