ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)
Between the ROG Swift PG39WCDM and UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode), the ROG Swift PG39WCDM comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery / screen size, while the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins on several specs. Overall, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM scores 79.8 and the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) scores 72.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The ROG Swift PG39WCDM edges ahead on the Mars Score (79.8 vs 72.5), but the 7.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the ROG Swift PG39WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, screen size, dci-p3 coverage, among others.
The UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), peak brightness, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Screen size — 23.81% more. 39 " vs 31.5 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 39 "lead | 31.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | OLED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 1440p | 4Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | truelead | false |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1300 nits | 1300 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98.5 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 Wlead | 65 W |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)?+
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)?+
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on ROG Swift PG39WCDM, 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode).
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.