Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE vs Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraSharp U2725QEDELLRENDER
Probe A
Dell
UltraSharp U2725QE
60.3/ 100C
Performance69· 45%
Panel49· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Smart Monitor M8 (2024)SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe B
Samsung
Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
65.5/ 100C
Performance70· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the UltraSharp U2725QE and Smart Monitor M8 (2024), the UltraSharp U2725QE comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery / refresh rate, while the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins on response time (gtg) / screen size. Overall, the UltraSharp U2725QE scores 60.3 and the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) scores 65.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Smart Monitor M8 (2024) edges ahead on the Mars Score (60.3 vs 65.5), but the 5.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the UltraSharp U2725QE if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, refresh rate, peak brightness, among others.

Pick the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are response time (gtg), screen size, dci-p3 coverage.

Both ship with comparable g-sync, freesync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE wins

  • USB-C Power Delivery — 115.38% more. 140 W vs 65 W.
  • Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 120 Hz vs 60 Hz.
  • Peak brightness — 12.50% more. 450 nits vs 400 nits.
  • Panel type: IPS (vs VA).

Why Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins

  • Response time (GtG) — 20.00% less. 4 ms vs 5 ms.
  • Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
  • DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecDell - UltraSharp U2725QESamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
Screen size27 "32 "lead
Panel typeIPSleadVA
Resolution4K4K
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curvedfalsefalse

Performance

SpecDell - UltraSharp U2725QESamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
Refresh rate120 Hzlead60 Hz
Response time (GtG)5 ms4 mslead
Peak brightness450 nitslead400 nits
DCI-P3 coverage98 %99 %lead
HDRtruetrue
G-Syncfalsefalse
FreeSyncfalsefalse

Connectivity

SpecDell - UltraSharp U2725QESamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports1lead0
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery140 Wlead65 W
KVMtrueleadfalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraSharp U2725QE or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+

UltraSharp U2725QE refreshes at 120Hz vs 60Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraSharp U2725QE or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+

Smart Monitor M8 (2024) responds in 4ms vs 5ms.

Does UltraSharp U2725QE or Smart Monitor M8 (2024) have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 140W on UltraSharp U2725QE, 65W on Smart Monitor M8 (2024).

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.