Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW vs Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraSharp U3825QWDELLRENDER
Probe A
Dell
UltraSharp U3825QW
71.2/ 100B
Performance70· 45%
Panel72· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe B
Samsung
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
89.0/ 100S
Performance84· 45%
Panel95· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the UltraSharp U3825QW and Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), the UltraSharp U3825QW comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery, while the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins on peak brightness / refresh rate. Overall, the UltraSharp U3825QW scores 71.2 and the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) scores 89 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 17.8 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the UltraSharp U3825QW if you care most about usb-c power delivery. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery.

Pick the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.

Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, g-sync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Dell - UltraSharp U3825QW wins

  • USB-C Power Delivery — 115.38% more. 140 W vs 65 W.

Why Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins

  • Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
  • Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
  • Screen size — 30.67% more. 49 " vs 37.5 ".
  • Has FreeSync.
  • Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecDell - UltraSharp U3825QWSamsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Screen size37.5 "49 "lead
Panel typeIPSQD-OLEDlead
Resolution4K5Klead
Aspect ratio21:932:9
Curvedtruetrue

Performance

SpecDell - UltraSharp U3825QWSamsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Refresh rate120 Hz240 Hzlead
Response time (GtG)5 ms0.03 mslead
Peak brightness450 nits1000 nitslead
DCI-P3 coverage99 %99 %
HDRtruetrue
G-Syncfalsefalse
FreeSyncfalsetruelead

Connectivity

SpecDell - UltraSharp U3825QWSamsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
HDMI ports2lead1
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery140 Wlead65 W
KVMtruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraSharp U3825QW or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+

Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraSharp U3825QW or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+

Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.

Does UltraSharp U3825QW or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 140W on UltraSharp U3825QW, 65W on Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC).

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.