Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B |
|---|---|---|
| Response time (GtG) | 0.03 ms | 1 ms |
| Peak brightness | 1000 nits | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 160 Hz |
| Screen size | 32 " | 27 " |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99 % | 98 % |
| Panel type | QD-OLED | IPS |
Between the AORUS FO32U2P and UltraGear 27GP950-B, the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in response time (gtg) / peak brightness, while the UltraGear 27GP950-B wins on several specs. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 78.2 and the UltraGear 27GP950-B scores 78.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are evenly matched on the broad strokes; the decision sits on which individual spec advantages weigh more for your use.
Pick the AORUS FO32U2P if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are response time (gtg), peak brightness, refresh rate, among others. The single most decisive one: Response time (GtG) — 97.00% less. 0.03 ms vs 1 ms.
The UltraGear 27GP950-B similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable g-sync, freesync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P or LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B?
The two products are effectively tied on the current Mars Score.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size, refresh rate, panel type against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P if…
Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P has the measurable edge on response time ms, peak brightness nits, refresh rate hz.
Choose LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B if…
LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 97.00% less. 0.03 ms vs 1 ms.
- ▲Peak brightness — 66.67% more. 1000 nits vs 600 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 50.00% more. 240 Hz vs 160 Hz.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Why LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 32 "lead | 27 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 160 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 1 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nitslead | 600 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 2lead | 1 |
| USB-C inputⓘ | truelead | false |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | — |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 27GP950-B?+
AORUS FO32U2P refreshes at 240Hz vs 160Hz.
Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 27GP950-B?+
AORUS FO32U2P responds in 0.03ms vs 1ms.
Does AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 27GP950-B have USB-C with power delivery?+
AORUS FO32U2P offers USB-C with 65W power delivery.