Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P vs LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)
Between the AORUS FO32U2P and UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode), the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in screen size / dci-p3 coverage, while the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins on peak brightness. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 and the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) scores 72.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 72.5). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the AORUS FO32U2P if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are screen size, dci-p3 coverage, panel type.
Pick the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), usb-c power delivery, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- ▲Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 31.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | OLED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1300 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98.5 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 2lead | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 65 W |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)?+
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)?+
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on AORUS FO32U2P, 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode).
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.