Between the AORUS FO32U2P and MPG 321URX, the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in several specs, while the MPG 321URX wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 and the MPG 321URX scores 73.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are evenly matched on the broad strokes, with the decision sitting on which individual spec advantages weigh more for your use.
The AORUS FO32U2P doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the MPG 321URX if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), peak brightness, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why MSI - MPG 321URX wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 50.77% more. 98 W vs 65 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 " | 32 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLED | QD-OLED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1000 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 2lead | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 98 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or MPG 321URX?+
MPG 321URX refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or MPG 321URX?+
MPG 321URX responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does AORUS FO32U2P or MPG 321URX have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on AORUS FO32U2P, 98W on MPG 321URX.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.