Between the AORUS FO32U2P and ProArt PA32UCXR, the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in refresh rate and response time (gtg), while the ProArt PA32UCXR wins on peak brightness and usb-c power delivery. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 and the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 65.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The AORUS FO32U2P edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 65.4), but the 7.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the AORUS FO32U2P if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, response time (gtg), dci-p3 coverage, among others.
Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, usb-c power delivery.
Both ship with comparable screen size, freesync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the AORUS FO32U2P is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 60.00% more. 1600 nits vs 1000 nits.
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 47.69% more. 96 W vs 65 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 " | 32 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1600 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 3lead |
| DisplayPort ports | 2lead | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 96 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
AORUS FO32U2P refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
AORUS FO32U2P responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does AORUS FO32U2P or ProArt PA32UCXR have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on AORUS FO32U2P, 96W on ProArt PA32UCXR.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.