Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P vs ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM |
|---|---|---|
| USB-C Power Delivery | 65 W | 90 W |
| Peak brightness | 1000 nits | 1300 nits |
| Screen size | 32 " | 34 " |
Between the AORUS FO32U2P and ROG Swift PG34WCDM, the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in several specs, while the ROG Swift PG34WCDM wins on usb-c power delivery / peak brightness. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 78.2 and the ROG Swift PG34WCDM scores 76.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (78.2 vs 76.8). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
The AORUS FO32U2P does not pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec-table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the ROG Swift PG34WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, peak brightness, screen size. The single most decisive one: USB-C Power Delivery — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), dci-p3 coverage, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P or ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM?
Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P leads the current Mars Score by 1.4 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P if…
Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
Choose ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM if…
ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM has the measurable edge on has usb c pd w, peak brightness nits, screen size in.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.
- ▲Screen size — 6.25% more. 34 " vs 32 ".
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 32 " | 34 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLED | QD-OLED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4Klead | 1440p |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | truelead |
Performance
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1300 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 2lead | 1 |
| USB-C inputⓘ | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 90 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or ROG Swift PG34WCDM?+
ROG Swift PG34WCDM refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or ROG Swift PG34WCDM?+
ROG Swift PG34WCDM responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does AORUS FO32U2P or ROG Swift PG34WCDM have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on AORUS FO32U2P, 90W on ROG Swift PG34WCDM.