Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P vs LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B
Between the AORUS FO32U2P and UltraGear 27GX790A-B, the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in screen size and dci-p3 coverage, while the UltraGear 27GX790A-B wins on refresh rate and peak brightness. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 and the UltraGear 27GX790A-B scores 72.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 72.6). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the AORUS FO32U2P if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are screen size, dci-p3 coverage, panel type.
Pick the UltraGear 27GX790A-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are refresh rate, peak brightness.
Both ship with comparable response time (gtg), usb-c power delivery, g-sync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- ▲Screen size — 20.75% more. 32 " vs 26.5 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Why LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 480 Hz vs 240 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 26.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | OLED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4Klead | 1440p |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 480 Hzlead |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1300 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98.5 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 2lead | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 65 W |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 27GX790A-B?+
UltraGear 27GX790A-B refreshes at 480Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 27GX790A-B?+
UltraGear 27GX790A-B responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 27GX790A-B have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on AORUS FO32U2P, 65W on UltraGear 27GX790A-B.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.