Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B vs Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraGear 27GP950-BLGRENDER
Probe A
LG
UltraGear 27GP950-B
78.2/ 100A
Performance78· 45%
Panel49· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Smart Monitor M8 (2024)SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe B
Samsung
Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
65.5/ 100C
Performance70· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the UltraGear 27GP950-B and Smart Monitor M8 (2024), the UltraGear 27GP950-B comes out ahead in refresh rate / response time (gtg), while the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins on screen size / dci-p3 coverage. Overall, the UltraGear 27GP950-B scores 78.2 and the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) scores 65.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The UltraGear 27GP950-B is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.7 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the UltraGear 27GP950-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, response time (gtg), peak brightness, among others.

Pick the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are screen size, dci-p3 coverage.

There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.

Bottom line: the UltraGear 27GP950-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B wins

  • Refresh rate — 166.67% more. 160 Hz vs 60 Hz.
  • Response time (GtG) — 75.00% less. 1 ms vs 4 ms.
  • Peak brightness — 50.00% more. 600 nits vs 400 nits.
  • Has G-Sync.
  • Has FreeSync.
  • Panel type: IPS (vs VA).

Why Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins

  • Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
  • DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecLG - UltraGear 27GP950-BSamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
Screen size27 "32 "lead
Panel typeIPSleadVA
Resolution4K4K
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curvedfalsefalse

Performance

SpecLG - UltraGear 27GP950-BSamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
Refresh rate160 Hzlead60 Hz
Response time (GtG)1 mslead4 ms
Peak brightness600 nitslead400 nits
DCI-P3 coverage98 %99 %lead
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctrueleadfalse
FreeSynctrueleadfalse

Connectivity

SpecLG - UltraGear 27GP950-BSamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
HDMI ports2lead1
DisplayPort ports1lead0
USB-C inputfalsetruelead
USB-C Power Delivery65 W
KVMfalsefalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 27GP950-B or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+

UltraGear 27GP950-B refreshes at 160Hz vs 60Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraGear 27GP950-B or Smart Monitor M8 (2024)?+

UltraGear 27GP950-B responds in 1ms vs 4ms.

Does UltraGear 27GP950-B or Smart Monitor M8 (2024) have USB-C with power delivery?+

Smart Monitor M8 (2024) offers USB-C with 65W power delivery.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.