Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) vs MSI - MPG 321URX

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual…LGILLUSTRATION
Probe A
LG
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)
76.5/ 100B
Performance83· 45%
Panel69· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
MPG 321URXMSIILLUSTRATION
Probe B
MSI
MPG 321URX
78.2/ 100A
Performance84· 45%
Panel72· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
The fork

Where they actually differ

The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)MSI - MPG 321URX
USB-C Power Delivery65 W98 W
Peak brightness1300 nits1000 nits
Screen size31.5 "32 "
DCI-P3 coverage98.5 %99 %
Panel typeOLEDQD-OLED
Quick verdict

Between the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) and MPG 321URX, the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) comes out ahead in peak brightness, while the MPG 321URX wins on usb-c power delivery / screen size. Overall, the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) scores 76.5 and the MPG 321URX scores 78.2 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (76.5 vs 78.2). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness. The single most decisive one: Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.

Pick the MPG 321URX if you care most about usb-c power delivery / screen size. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, screen size, dci-p3 coverage, among others. The single most decisive one: USB-C Power Delivery — 50.77% more. 98 W vs 65 W.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), g-sync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Decision guide

Which should you buy: LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MSI - MPG 321URX?

MSI - MPG 321URX leads the current Mars Score by 1.7 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size, panel type against the way you will actually use the product.

Choose LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) if…

LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) has the measurable edge on peak brightness nits.

Choose MSI - MPG 321URX if…

MSI - MPG 321URX has the measurable edge on has usb c pd w, screen size in, color gamut dci p3 pct.

This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.

Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins

  • Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.

Why MSI - MPG 321URX wins

  • USB-C Power Delivery — 50.77% more. 98 W vs 65 W.
  • Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
  • DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
  • Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)MSI - MPG 321URX
Screen size31.5 "32 "lead
Panel typeOLEDQD-OLEDlead
Resolution4K4K
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curvedfalsefalse

Performance

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)MSI - MPG 321URX
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz
Response time (GtG)0.03 ms0.03 ms
Peak brightness1300 nitslead1000 nits
DCI-P3 coverage98.5 %99 %lead
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctruetrue
FreeSynctruetrue

Connectivity

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)MSI - MPG 321URX
HDMI ports22
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery65 W98 Wlead
KVMfalsetruelead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 321URX?+

MPG 321URX refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 321URX?+

MPG 321URX responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.

Does UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 321URX have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode), 98W on MPG 321URX.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands