Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) vs Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual…LGRENDER
Probe A
LG
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)
72.5/ 100B
Performance83· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe B
Samsung
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
89.0/ 100S
Performance84· 45%
Panel95· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) and Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) comes out ahead in peak brightness / g-sync, while the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins on screen size / dci-p3 coverage. Overall, the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) scores 72.5 and the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) scores 89 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 16.5 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, g-sync.

Pick the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are screen size, dci-p3 coverage, panel type.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), usb-c power delivery, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins

  • Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.
  • Has G-Sync.

Why Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins

  • Screen size — 55.56% more. 49 " vs 31.5 ".
  • DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
  • Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Screen size31.5 "49 "lead
Panel typeOLEDQD-OLEDlead
Resolution4K5Klead
Aspect ratio16:932:9
Curvedfalsetruelead

Performance

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz
Response time (GtG)0.03 ms0.03 ms
Peak brightness1300 nitslead1000 nits
DCI-P3 coverage98.5 %99 %lead
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctrueleadfalse
FreeSynctruetrue

Connectivity

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
HDMI ports2lead1
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery65 W65 W
KVMfalsetruelead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+

Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+

Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.

Does UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode), 65W on Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC).

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.