Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B vs ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraGear 45GX950A-BLGRENDER
Probe A
LG
UltraGear 45GX950A-B
83.8/ 100A
Performance81· 45%
Panel87· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
ProArt PA32UCXRASUSRENDER
Probe B
ASUS
ProArt PA32UCXR
65.4/ 100C
Performance69· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the UltraGear 45GX950A-B and ProArt PA32UCXR, the UltraGear 45GX950A-B comes out ahead in response time (gtg) / screen size, while the ProArt PA32UCXR wins on peak brightness / usb-c power delivery. Overall, the UltraGear 45GX950A-B scores 83.8 and the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 65.4 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The UltraGear 45GX950A-B is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 18.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the UltraGear 45GX950A-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are response time (gtg), screen size, refresh rate, among others.

Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, usb-c power delivery.

Both ship with comparable freesync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the UltraGear 45GX950A-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B wins

  • Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
  • Screen size — 40.63% more. 45 " vs 32 ".
  • Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Has G-Sync.
  • DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 98.5 % vs 98 %.
  • Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).

Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins

  • Peak brightness — 23.08% more. 1600 nits vs 1300 nits.
  • USB-C Power Delivery — 6.67% more. 96 W vs 90 W.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecLG - UltraGear 45GX950A-BASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR
Screen size45 "lead32 "
Panel typeOLEDleadIPS
Resolution5Klead4K
Aspect ratio21:916:9
Curvedtrueleadfalse

Performance

SpecLG - UltraGear 45GX950A-BASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR
Refresh rate165 Hzlead120 Hz
Response time (GtG)0.03 mslead5 ms
Peak brightness1300 nits1600 nitslead
DCI-P3 coverage98.5 %lead98 %
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctrueleadfalse
FreeSynctruetrue

Connectivity

SpecLG - UltraGear 45GX950A-BASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR
HDMI ports23lead
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery90 W96 Wlead
KVMtruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 45GX950A-B or ProArt PA32UCXR?+

UltraGear 45GX950A-B refreshes at 165Hz vs 120Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraGear 45GX950A-B or ProArt PA32UCXR?+

UltraGear 45GX950A-B responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.

Does UltraGear 45GX950A-B or ProArt PA32UCXR have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on UltraGear 45GX950A-B, 96W on ProArt PA32UCXR.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.