vsMars
Head-to-head

LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B vs Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraGear 45GX950A-BLGRENDER
Probe A
LG
UltraGear 45GX950A-B
83.8/ 100A
Performance81· 45%
Panel87· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
UltraSharp U3225QEDELLRENDER
Probe B
Dell
UltraSharp U3225QE
65.3/ 100C
Performance70· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the UltraGear 45GX950A-B and UltraSharp U3225QE, the UltraGear 45GX950A-B comes out ahead in peak brightness / response time (gtg), while the UltraSharp U3225QE wins on usb-c power delivery / dci-p3 coverage. Overall, the UltraGear 45GX950A-B scores 83.8 and the UltraSharp U3225QE scores 65.3 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The UltraGear 45GX950A-B is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 18.5 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the UltraGear 45GX950A-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, response time (gtg), screen size, among others.

Pick the UltraSharp U3225QE if you care most about usb-c power delivery / dci-p3 coverage. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, dci-p3 coverage.

There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.

Bottom line: the UltraGear 45GX950A-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B wins

  • ▲Peak brightness — 188.89% more. 1300 nits vs 450 nits.
  • ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
  • ▲Screen size — 42.86% more. 45 " vs 31.5 ".
  • ▲Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • ▲Has G-Sync.
  • ▲Has FreeSync.
  • ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).

Why Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE wins

  • ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 55.56% more. 140 W vs 90 W.
  • ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecLG - UltraGear 45GX950A-BDell - UltraSharp U3225QE
Screen sizeⓘ45 "lead31.5 "
Panel typeⓘOLEDleadIPS
Resolutionⓘ5Klead4K
Aspect ratioⓘ21:916:9
Curvedⓘtrueleadfalse

Performance

SpecLG - UltraGear 45GX950A-BDell - UltraSharp U3225QE
Refresh rateⓘ165 Hzlead120 Hz
Response time (GtG)ⓘ0.03 mslead5 ms
Peak brightnessⓘ1300 nitslead450 nits
DCI-P3 coverageⓘ98.5 %99 %lead
HDRⓘtruetrue
G-Syncⓘtrueleadfalse
FreeSyncⓘtrueleadfalse

Connectivity

SpecLG - UltraGear 45GX950A-BDell - UltraSharp U3225QE
HDMI ports2lead1
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ90 W140 Wlead
KVMtruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 45GX950A-B or UltraSharp U3225QE?+

UltraGear 45GX950A-B refreshes at 165Hz vs 120Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraGear 45GX950A-B or UltraSharp U3225QE?+

UltraGear 45GX950A-B responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.

Does UltraGear 45GX950A-B or UltraSharp U3225QE have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on UltraGear 45GX950A-B, 140W on UltraSharp U3225QE.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

Screen size→Panel type→Resolution→Aspect ratio→Curved→Refresh rate→Response time (GtG)→Peak brightness→DCI-P3 coverage→HDR→G-Sync→FreeSync→
By manufacturer

More from the same brands

LG →4
Dell →4

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.