Between the MPG 321URX and UltraGear 32GS95UE-B, the MPG 321URX comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery / screen size, while the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B wins on peak brightness. Overall, the MPG 321URX scores 73.2 and the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B scores 72.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 72.5). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the MPG 321URX if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, screen size, dci-p3 coverage, among others.
Pick the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), g-sync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why MSI - MPG 321URX wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 50.77% more. 98 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | MSI - MPG 321URX | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 31.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | OLED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | MSI - MPG 321URX | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1300 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98.5 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | MSI - MPG 321URX | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 98 Wlead | 65 W |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, MPG 321URX or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B?+
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, MPG 321URX or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B?+
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does MPG 321URX or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 98W on MPG 321URX, 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.