Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) vs ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG) | 0.03 ms | 5 ms |
| Peak brightness | 1000 nits | 1600 nits |
| Screen size | 49 " | 32 " |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 65 W | 96 W |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99 % | 98 % |
Between the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) and ProArt PA32UCXR, the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) comes out ahead in refresh rate / response time (gtg), while the ProArt PA32UCXR wins on peak brightness / usb-c power delivery. Overall, the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) scores 85.6 and the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 66.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 19.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, response time (gtg), screen size, among others. The single most decisive one: Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if you care most about peak brightness / usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, usb-c power delivery. The single most decisive one: Peak brightness — 60.00% more. 1600 nits vs 1000 nits.
Both ship with comparable g-sync, freesync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR?
Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) leads the current Mars Score by 19.4 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size, refresh rate, panel type against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if…
Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) has the measurable edge on refresh rate hz, response time ms, screen size in.
Choose ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR if…
ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR has the measurable edge on peak brightness nits, has usb c pd w.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 53.13% more. 49 " vs 32 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 60.00% more. 1600 nits vs 1000 nits.
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 47.69% more. 96 W vs 65 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 49 "lead | 32 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 5Klead | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 32:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | truelead | false |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1600 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 1 | 3lead |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C inputⓘ | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 96 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or ProArt PA32UCXR have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), 96W on ProArt PA32UCXR.