Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) vs ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR
Between the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) and ProArt PA32UCXR, the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) comes out ahead in refresh rate / response time (gtg), while the ProArt PA32UCXR wins on peak brightness / usb-c power delivery. Overall, the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) scores 89 and the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 65.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 23.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, response time (gtg), screen size, among others.
Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, usb-c power delivery.
Both ship with comparable g-sync, freesync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 53.13% more. 49 " vs 32 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 60.00% more. 1600 nits vs 1000 nits.
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 47.69% more. 96 W vs 65 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 49 "lead | 32 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 5Klead | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 32:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | truelead | false |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1600 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 1 | 3lead |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 96 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or ProArt PA32UCXR?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or ProArt PA32UCXR have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), 96W on ProArt PA32UCXR.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.