Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) vs Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE
Between the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) and UltraSharp U3225QE, the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) comes out ahead in peak brightness / refresh rate, while the UltraSharp U3225QE wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) scores 89 and the UltraSharp U3225QE scores 65.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 23.7 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.
Pick the UltraSharp U3225QE if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery.
Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, g-sync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 55.56% more. 49 " vs 31.5 ".
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Why Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 115.38% more. 140 W vs 65 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 49 "lead | 31.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 5Klead | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 32:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | truelead | false |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nitslead | 450 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 140 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or UltraSharp U3225QE have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), 140W on UltraSharp U3225QE.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.