Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) vs Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Peak brightness | 1000 nits | 450 nits |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 65 W | 140 W |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG) | 0.03 ms | 5 ms |
| Screen size | 49 " | 31.5 " |
| FreeSync | true | false |
Between the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) and UltraSharp U3225QE, the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) comes out ahead in peak brightness / refresh rate, while the UltraSharp U3225QE wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) scores 85.6 and the UltraSharp U3225QE scores 66.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 19.2 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others. The single most decisive one: Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
Pick the UltraSharp U3225QE if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery. The single most decisive one: USB-C Power Delivery — 115.38% more. 140 W vs 65 W.
Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, g-sync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE?
Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) leads the current Mars Score by 19.2 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size, refresh rate, panel type against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if…
Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) has the measurable edge on peak brightness nits, refresh rate hz, response time ms.
Choose Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE if…
Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE has the measurable edge on has usb c pd w.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 55.56% more. 49 " vs 31.5 ".
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Why Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 115.38% more. 140 W vs 65 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 49 "lead | 31.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 5Klead | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 32:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | truelead | false |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nitslead | 450 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C inputⓘ | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 140 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) or UltraSharp U3225QE have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), 140W on UltraSharp U3225QE.