Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) vs Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Smart Monitor M8 (2024)SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Smart Monitor M8 (2024)
65.5/ 100C
Performance70· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Studio Display (Nano-textu…APPLERENDER
Probe B
Apple
Studio Display (Nano-texture)
56.1/ 100D
Performance62· 45%
Panel49· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) and Studio Display (Nano-texture), the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) comes out ahead in response time (gtg) / screen size, while the Studio Display (Nano-texture) wins on peak brightness / usb-c power delivery. Overall, the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) scores 65.5 and the Studio Display (Nano-texture) scores 56.1 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Smart Monitor M8 (2024) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 9.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are response time (gtg), screen size.

Pick the Studio Display (Nano-texture) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, usb-c power delivery, panel type.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, dci-p3 coverage, g-sync, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins

  • Response time (GtG) — 50.00% less. 4 ms vs 8 ms.
  • Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".

Why Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) wins

  • Peak brightness — 50.00% more. 600 nits vs 400 nits.
  • USB-C Power Delivery — 47.69% more. 96 W vs 65 W.
  • Panel type: IPS (vs VA).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecSamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)
Screen size32 "lead27 "
Panel typeVAIPSlead
Resolution4K5Klead
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curvedfalsefalse

Performance

SpecSamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Response time (GtG)4 mslead8 ms
Peak brightness400 nits600 nitslead
DCI-P3 coverage99 %99 %
HDRtrueleadfalse
G-Syncfalsefalse
FreeSyncfalsefalse

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024)Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)
HDMI ports1lead0
DisplayPort ports00
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery65 W96 Wlead
KVMfalsefalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, Smart Monitor M8 (2024) or Studio Display (Nano-texture)?+

Studio Display (Nano-texture) refreshes at 60Hz vs 60Hz.

Which has faster response time, Smart Monitor M8 (2024) or Studio Display (Nano-texture)?+

Smart Monitor M8 (2024) responds in 4ms vs 8ms.

Does Smart Monitor M8 (2024) or Studio Display (Nano-texture) have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on Smart Monitor M8 (2024), 96W on Studio Display (Nano-texture).

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.