Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) vs Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE
Between the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) and UltraSharp U3225QE, the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) comes out ahead in response time (gtg) and screen size, while the UltraSharp U3225QE wins on usb-c power delivery and refresh rate. Overall, the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) scores 65.5 and the UltraSharp U3225QE scores 65.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (65.5 vs 65.3). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Smart Monitor M8 (2024) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are response time (gtg), screen size.
Pick the UltraSharp U3225QE if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, refresh rate, peak brightness, among others.
Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, g-sync, freesync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) wins
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 20.00% less. 4 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
Why Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 115.38% more. 140 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 120 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 12.50% more. 450 nits vs 400 nits.
- ▲Panel type: IPS (vs VA).
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 31.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | VA | IPSlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 60 Hz | 120 Hzlead |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 4 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 400 nits | 450 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | false | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung - Smart Monitor M8 (2024) | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 0 | 1lead |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 140 Wlead |
| KVM | false | truelead |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Smart Monitor M8 (2024) or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
UltraSharp U3225QE refreshes at 120Hz vs 60Hz.
Which has faster response time, Smart Monitor M8 (2024) or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
Smart Monitor M8 (2024) responds in 4ms vs 5ms.
Does Smart Monitor M8 (2024) or UltraSharp U3225QE have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on Smart Monitor M8 (2024), 140W on UltraSharp U3225QE.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.